Blog

Posts Tagged ‘polls’

A prediction: Afghanistan will simmer as long as health care is on the table

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

Considering my first political campaigns included Jesse Ventura’s win in 1998 and Paul Wellstone’s death in 2002, I’ve come to expect the unexpected in politics. But as President Obama continues to push back his Afghanistan announcement, I’m willing to make a prediction: The White House will not announce an Afghanistan strategy until the health care push is effectively over.

Why? I start with the premise that the White House cannot push forward on Afghanistan and health care at the same time. There is simply not enough bandwidth in Congress or political capital remaining in the Democratic Party. We see evidence of this every day: When the President is not pushing for health care, the legislation’s progress immediately slows to a crawl. This week alone, the Senate’s made virtually no progress on health care while the President is overseas.

As new poll numbers show, the nation is now so divided and pessimistic about the war in Afghanistan, whatever the President decides will be a tough sell. His expected proposal to surge tens of thousands of additional troops into the war zone will immediately shift the national and Congressional debate to international issues for weeks – a pause that would effectively kill any momentum to pass health care legislation.

In retrospect, I suspect the health care debate is the major reason why the President’s Afghanistan decision is so overdue. It’s increasingly not credible to believe the President doesn’t have a very good idea of what he’s going to do in Afghanistan. Having taken withdrawal off the table, there is only one solution under serious consideration – a surge of 35,000 troops, plus or minus 5,000. Sure, the White House keeps floating new options and insisting that the President has not made up his mind – but that tactic increasingly seems like a head fake to explain the lack of an announcement of the new strategy.

Remember: The White House wanted the health care debate to be over months ago; they certainly did not plan on it dragging into next year, as now seems likely. The White House has invested so much into the health care initiatives, it can no longer not end up signing a bill — but that means postponing an Afghanistan strategy that was originally promised weeks ago but is now “weeks away”.

I’m sure President Obama does not want to keep Afghanistan simmering on the back burner, but I predict he will so long as health care is on the table.

Shaping Afghanistan public opinion

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

There’s been a lot of discussion in the last 24 hours about the slumping support for the war in Afghanistan, based on new poll numbers showing a majority of Americans believe the war there is similar to Vietnam. So far, the analysis has focused on whether those poor numbers should or will impact President Obama’s upcoming decision on troop levels.

With all due respect to the pundits, I think a better question is why the poll numbers are so bad. Public opinion does not exist in a vacuum — it is shaped by messages and experiences. In the case of Afghanistan, the latter has been awful for months now, while the former has been non-existent. In other words, rather than ignoring the war all summer, and publicly vacillating on its direction all fall, wouldn’t the war be more popular now if the President had consistently explained and advocated his strategy?

Looking forward, it’s clear that an aggressive PR campaign will be required to maintain public support if the President decides on any strategy other than withdrawal (which itself will likely be unpopular with much of the country). So far, he’s shown no interest in attempting to rally public support for the war — let alone invest political capital in it. Is it possible that that reticence is now factoring into his decision more than the actual numbers?

Getting back to the economy

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

I’ve suspected part of the reason the President’s poll numbers slipped this summer is because his number one priority (health care reform) is out of step with the country’s number one priority (the economy).

To wit: The NBC/WSJ poll in July showed 62 percent of Americans naming the economy and job creation as a top priority. By comparison, only thirty-two percent cited health care reform.

So with health care reform temporarily tabled as Congress begins its August recess, it’s unsurprising the President is spending this week tacking back to economic messages. In theory, if he can mollify people’s concerns over jobs, then he may see a rise in his poll numbers – which would make passing health care reform this fall significantly easier.

Except that after mis-messaging on health care, the Administration’s initial economic push seems similarly off stride. For starters, they’re taking credit for an economic recovery that many economists (and most Americans) think is premature at best. And the Administration officials’ openness to middle-class tax increases on yesterday’s Sunday shows must not have generated the headlines Obama wanted.

It’s worth recalling that President Obama struggled last summer, as well. A year ago this week, some polls actually showed John McCain beating Obama. But Obama was able to regain control of the campaign then (thanks in part to his huge financial advantage and some McCain missteps) – so it’s obviously far too early to count him out.

Connect

Archives

Tags

ABC afghanistan AP Axelrod baseball budget campaign CBS chicago tribune cillizza clinton CNN communications Congress disaster economics eurobama europe flip-flop gaffes gibbs health care Huffington Post image Jon Stewart media mike allen Minnesota myths NBC new york times obama palin pandemic politico polls President Bush press conference Republicans Reuters roll-out tax cuts wall street journal washington post White House