Blog

Posts Tagged ‘flip-flop’

Obama comes full orbit on NASA funding

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

The LA Times reports today that President Obama’s upcoming budget proposal will essentially scrap NASA’s Constellation program, which had aimed to return humans to the moon by 2020.

Thus completes a total flip-flop-flip in the President’s position on human space flight.

By way of background: Way back in 2007, then-candidate Obama proposed dramatic cuts in NASA’s budget to fund his education initiatives. Specifically, Obama said he was not convinced that human space flight was worth the costs and risks, and wanted to delay or abandon plans to travel to the moon and Mars. (In what is likely not a coincidence, the same day the LA Times reports on NASA budget cuts, the Wall Street Journal reports today on an upcoming boost in education spending.)

But when the Florida, Texas and Ohio (where thousands of NASA employees and contractors work) primaries suddenly became important, he began to backtrack. By August 2008, Obama was campaigning hard in Orlando, Florida, and pledged to support NASA funding and human space exploration. Reported the Houston Chronicle:

In a policy paper released Sunday by his campaign, the presumptive Democratic nominee said his goal was to “minimize the gap” between the end of the shuttle program and the beginning of future manned missions. He also said he was hoping “to ensure retention of” thousands of NASA workers in Texas and Florida whose jobs are threatened by a possible five-year gap before the beginning of the Constellation initiative to send astronauts to the moon and Mars.

In his first budget, Obama’s NASA funding was closer to his later campaign positions than his earlier ones: Rather than cutting space programs to fund other domestic initiatives, he boosted NASA funding by about $900 million. More importantly, he made a clear commitment to human space flight, and endorsed the “goal of returning Americans to the moon and exploring other destinations.”

A year later, an administration official is telling the LA Times the opposite today:

“We certainly don’t need to go back to the moon,” one administration official said.

More evidence that if you don’t like an Obama position, just wait until the next go around.

Transparently broken promises

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

Lynn Sweet today turns in a must-read piece detailing President Obama’s broken promise to make negotiations on health care transparent. Writes Lynn:

When candidate Barack Obama was criss-crossing the country in his two year presidential campaign, a standard part of his stump speech — lines that always won him applause — had to do with his promise to negotiate health care reform in public, on C-SPAN, for all to see. As the wrangling over health overhaul legislation heads into its final stretch, it’s clear that was a promise President Obama did not keep. The deal making remained behind closed doors.

There’s no arguing that this is among President Obama’s most blatant broken promises. He did not hedge his commitment on the campaign trail – it was a riff he repeated at virtually every campaign stop. As Lynn writes:

Obama said variations of that at scores of stops. At a Jan. 31, 2008, debate in Los Angeles, he said he would deal in the open, “not negotiating behind closed doors, but bringing all parties ogether, and broadcasting those negotiations on C-SPAN so that the American people can see what the choices are, because part of what we have to do is enlist the American people in this process.”

To explain the switch, Lynn presumes that the Obama team simply calculated that passing a bill negotiated in secrecy was better than not passing a bill negotiated publicly. But this is far from the first process-oriented promise that the Obama Team has unapologetically dropped: For example, he’s also nominated lobbyists to senior Administration spots, failed to wait 72-hours to sign bills, and hedged on his commitments to limit signing statements and government secrecy.

In truth, I suspect that the Obama Team never intended to keep his good-government promises – that they were useful rhetorical tools on the campaign trail, but not serious governing priorities. And, so far, they seem right — the public-backlash has been minimal. But these sort of flip-flops nevertheless hurt the President’s credibility, and will make voters more skeptical of his promises when he seeks re-election in 2012.

“Change We Can’t Believe In?”

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

A lot’s been written by myself and others about how different President Obama is from candidate Obama. Today, Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus raises the bar, asking “What happened to Obama’s promises?”:

Every new president encounters this tension, but it is, I think, more acute, and therefore more politically treacherous, for Obama. … Seemingly simple campaign pledges turn out to be intractable problems. … Clear positions yield to political realities. … Which leads to the core question facing the still-young administration: What happens when people start to wonder whether they can really believe in this change?

Ruth focuses on Obama’s drifting Guantanamo, “Don’t-ask-don’t-tell”, and transparency promises, but of course there are many others. For example, as I wrote in POLITICO back in June:

Even before taking office, Obama broke his promise to not appoint lobbyists to his administration. Since then, he’s abandoned his promises to pay for every dollar of new government spending and bring home all combat troops from Iraq within 18 months. And in recent days, he’s outraged his political base by reversing his earlier commitments to eliminate military tribunals and release photos depicting prisoner abuse.

Ultimately, this is an issue of credibility for Obama. Because with every broken promise and policy reversal, the public will grow more skeptical about his future pledges.

Connect

Archives

Tags

ABC afghanistan AP Axelrod baseball budget campaign CBS chicago tribune cillizza clinton CNN communications Congress disaster economics eurobama europe flip-flop gaffes gibbs health care Huffington Post image Jon Stewart media mike allen Minnesota myths NBC new york times obama palin pandemic politico polls President Bush press conference Republicans Reuters roll-out tax cuts wall street journal washington post White House