Daily analysis of our nation’s president, politics & favorite pastime...

Blaming the White House’s messengers

February 25th, 2010

Given all of President Obama’s political problems, there’s a growing sentiment that something must be wrong with his message team. Reports the Hill Newspaper:

The White House fumbled the message on healthcare reform and left President Barack Obama’s administration hanging in the balance, according to Democratic lawmakers and senior aides.

In his first year, Obama failed to use the bully pulpit effectively and rally the public around one proposal early in the debate, despite polls showing strong support for core elements of the Democratic plan, the lawmakers and aides told The Hill.

The piece goes on to quote a Presidential historian who studies White House communications:

Feldstein ranked Obama’s press operation in the bottom half of presidents since Nixon.

“It’s been surprising how weak the Obama message machine has been since he has been elected president,” Feldstein said. “Too often they’ve turned to Obama’s oratory to save the day as a last resort to clean up the message mess.”

In a rather half-hearted defense of Obama’s team, Clinton White House Press Secretary points out that the current media environment is more challenging than any before it:

McCurry argued that the diminishing influence of daily newspapers and network television, combined with the raw, chaotic power of cable news, talk radio and the Internet, has made it very difficult for White House advisers to manage the message.

“They’re adjusting to the new history they’re in,” McCurry said of Obama’s press team. “They’re utterly encumbered by the historic transformation of the media itself.”

McCurry noted that when Clinton served as president, two-thirds of Americans got their news from nightly television broadcasts. A 2008 Pew Research Center poll showed that only 32 percent of the public regularly learned of political news from nightly network broadcasts.

I’ve obviously wondered about some of the White House press team’s tactics over the last year, but this sort of finger-pointing seems off-base. I would submit that the larger problems at the White House is legislative team’s repeated failure to whip enough votes in support of the President’s agenda, the political team’s failure to win major elections since 2008, the policy team’s uninspiring health care proposals, and the strategic team’s arguable miscalculation to push health care rather than jobs. Given all those problems, the message team’s job is much, much harder.

Share

Presidential Pressers

February 22nd, 2010

President Obama has now gone longer than President Bush ever did between formal news conferences, the Washington Times reports today:

President George W. Bush’s longest stretch between prime-time, nationally televised press conferences was 214 days, from April 4 to Nov. 4, 2004. Mr. Obama tops that record on Monday, going 215 days - stretching back to July 22, according to records kept by CBS Radio’s veteran reporter Mark Knoller.

When I first launched this blog almost a year ago (!), I wrote quite a bit about how the White House was misusing (in part by overusing) the power of a presidential news conference. (In fact, my first post was in response to one of his primetime press conferences.)

News conferences are good for explaining complex policies and turning the page on unpleasant events. They are not very good for driving a message, since the questions and answers are too unpredictable and process-oriented. But since a news conference is also the only way a President can sustain an hour of live primetime coverage to discuss domestic policy without convening a joint session of Congress (which he eventually also did in the health care campaign), early on the White House used several press conferences to try and drive their health care message. Not surprisingly, this approach backfired, and in the third (and final) press conference, the President’s last answer knocked his agenda seriously off-message. Recalls the Times:

The president has seemingly shunned formal, prime-time sessions since his last disastrous presser, when he said police in Cambridge, Mass., “acted stupidly” by arresting a Harvard professor who broke into a home that turned out to be his own. The off-the-cuff comment took over the news cycle for a week, overshadowing his push for health care reform, and culminated in a White House “Beer Summit,” where the president hosted white police officer James Crowley and the black Harvard professor, Henry Louis Gates Jr.

But it now appears that the White House has over-corrected for over-using formal press conferences last summer. Granted, the networks would never give the President another hour of primetime coverage in the middle of sweeps and the Olympics, and the benefits of hosting a mid-day press conference are diminished. But considering how well the President normally does at the formal news conferences, and how he’s exhausted the salience of one-on-one interviews (seriously, has any national TV reporter not interviewed the President yet?), the long-gap in formal press conferences seems like a mistake.

Share

White House’s new press strategy

February 16th, 2010

On FOX News this afternoon, I discussed the White House’s plans to shift away from the flood-the-zone strategy and instead be more strategic in their use of the President and surrogates (a shift that I suggested they consider months ago).

Here’s the interview:

Share

Connect

Archives

Tags

ABC afghanistan AP Axelrod baseball budget campaign CBS chicago tribune cillizza clinton CNN communications Congress disaster economics eurobama europe flip-flop gaffes gibbs health care Huffington Post image Jon Stewart media mike allen Minnesota myths NBC new york times obama palin pandemic politico polls President Bush press conference Republicans Reuters roll-out tax cuts wall street journal washington post White House